Originally Posted by EmBoLa.be
Lolz and AGAIN you ppl try to say fake without proof.
As I SAID, i DON'T have to prove to you ****, PROVE IT YOURSELF IF YOU THINK IT'S A FAKE, but everytime a person links to an exploit or cfw you always say's fake,
Most of them are fake, but that dosn't mean that everythink is fake,
Prove it that's its fake, YOU CAN'T, AND I DON'T HAVE TO PROOF IF IT'S REAL, YOU ASK FOR PROOF? THEN BY ALL MEANS PROOF IT IF IT'S FAKE.
it's always EASY to say it's a fake without proof, but to say it's real with proof then you PPl still say its fake, you ppl have to much moron intellect,
This is why the scene never progresses, because of YOU.
Man serioulsy you must have some kind of mental disease....
Proofs are requested for prove that something is real, not for prove that's fake.
I can also say i'm your real father, but will you trust me whitout proof?
But in same way you've to belive me if i give you a dna test.Use your focking brain before talk.
And btw you want a proof about it being a fake? look at the video, look at ppl installing it whit 0 report about it working... this is more than a proof and you are an idiot imho
Originally Posted by pereb27
You're confusing public keys and private keys. In order to make a 3.60+ CFW, we need to decrypt the FW, which isn't possible atm because we need bootldr/lv0. IF 3.60+ FW is decrypted, you can make a CFW of it using 3.55 private keys (however you can only install this on machines that didn't come with 3.60+ stock, and you'll need a flasher if the machine is already on 3.56+). There will be no way to sign a CFW for the newer consoles with factory 3.60+, a new exploit will be needed for those.
Nope i'm not confusing them, private keys = encrypt and public = decrypt.
If you sayning the true explain me why we have 3.56 public keys out since february but still no a 3.56 cfw ( we just have 3.56 eboot signed whit 3.55 keys).
Once you get lvl 0 you get full control of the hardware not only some public keys :D