Originally Posted by Benzonia
I'm sorry, I really should just scroll back through the last 12 pages to find the answer myself, but... When exactly did Calliope say the wiki was falsified ON PURPOSE?
I thought he merely made the claim that it has had, in the past, at some point in time, false information. Which seems reasonable to me, and not slanderous.
|
He says "There
is some misinformation", if he had said there "was", then perhaps people wouldn't be so annoyed, but saying there "is", when the likes of
@
euss
looks after and maintains the wiki and keeps an eye on all the edits, will get people annoyed.