View Single Post
Old 05-07-2012   #24
fahadsul3man
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USSR
Posts: 914
Likes: 466
Liked 265 Times in 184 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to fahadsul3man Send a message via Skype™ to fahadsul3man
Originally Posted by Wolfie708 View Post
Yes, the USA are well known for funding such things, but so is the UK and everyone else, just to a lesser degree.

The question you need to ask though is what would happen if they did not fund it, would peace and harmony prosper and grow?

Simple answer is not a snow balls chance in hell.

The USA are a good and easy target to blame, but if there was not the demand, there could not be the supply.

Yes, I know I have simplified things a Lot, but it is humanity that causes, starts, and profits from wars, not one single section of it.

I am lucky that I live in a country not suffering from the direct consequences of current wars, but on the flip side it does allow me to see the bigger picture with less bias, and to people on both sides of the fences, all I can honestly say that I see is humans torturing and killing humans for monetary and power based gains regardless of their beliefs and 'honest' motives
good point , but if usa wouldnt had funded the terrorist networks in 80s , 3000 ppl wouldnt had to die on 9/11 neither did 15000 soviet troops and of course 2 million ppl would not had to leave their homes , this also spread fire to chechnya and bosnia , further killing and displacing ppl , so who is to blame? the evil scientist or the frankstein ?
fahadsul3man is offline   Reply With Quote