Originally Posted by Asure
Looking at the files, and current facts you can draw the conclusion most 3.56+ consoles
A. Don't accept our signed pups.
B. Don't accept lv0, boot boot from lv0.2 instead.
Must be a good reason why we can't sign a pup for properly software downgrading of an old console. Maybe they changed something in the pups later on. Or something not yet understood?
Btw. someone asked the exact same thing on the dev wiki..
lv0.2 is not what I am asking for, I'm talking about FAT and hackable PS3.
Your first (A) has no evidence. I've unpacked and packed an original firmware and the PS3 with 4.25 accepted it. So we can repack PUPs for 3.56+..