Originally Posted by Annelies
He wouldn't have killed as many people as he did if he didn't have guns and he would have been stopped a lot sooner -- assuming he wouldn't have taken his own life with a knife or something.
|
True, he may not have killed as many people if he didn't have a gun, but he would have still killed people. To me, even 1 person is too many. And if some of those teachers or staff had a gun handy, they could have ended his miserable life for him as soon as he fired the first round in a school. Game over. Maybe he would have only killed or wounded 1 person because mr.principal happened to have a hand cannon under his desk and he came out when he heard the first shot. Although, if it happened that way, since Americans are so damn ridiculous, the question wouldn't be why did he start shooting. Instead it would be....why did the principal have a gun. Then everyone could jump on the "he shouldn't have had a gun in the school bandwagon".....well.....everyone except the parents of the children who got to come home because he had a gun.
