View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013   #3
baileyscream
Senior Member
 
baileyscream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 530
Liked 997 Times in 500 Posts
Mentioned: 483 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by underwurlde View Post
Perhaps he worked out what the protocol used on the EIB bus is between the Southbridge and the Starship2.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was NOResque in other words making the two NANDs 'look' like (in hardware) a NOR chip to the SouthBridge...
...my thinking here is if Sony removes the 2 NANDs & removes the Starship2 and instead bungs in a NOR instead, therefore no need to change the SouthBridge <- it remains the same device regardless of NAND / NOR. = cheaper, easier to manufacture PS3 hardware.


Or instead of working out this magical protocol, worked out what those test pads were, i.e. basically assumed what I have above and then sussed out all the control test-pads, Address test-pads and data test-pads. Once done, connected up a NOR hardware flasher, viola?

Wild stab in the dark all that of course.

Andy
he does say the starship does make the 2 nands work as a nor chip
so what your saying is right 1 nor = 1 starship + 2 nands hardware wise.

what got my interest in this was that he said he has dumped / flashed by connecting a nor flasher to the nor type test points and the starship chip removes the bad blocks (ie it must re-sort them on the fly) and no need for de-interleaving

if we can get the correct points mapped then this would solve bad flashing on nand consoles
baileyscream is offline   Reply With Quote