Originally Posted by marty370
Seems like a backwards step to have a 8 core CPU running at 1.6Ghz low clock speeds. I mean CELL is a 9 Core CPU(8 core in PS3(one disabled for yeilds) with all cores running at a high 3.2Ghz clock speed.
|
Clocks and cores will never change near as much as the technology in which they work with the rest of the hardware will. For instance, on a computer clocks and cores are only as good as the chipset on the motherboard. I have 775 asrock motherboard that has a core 2 duo processor that doesnt run near aswell when compared to it being put in my asus mobo. Thats because Asrock chipsets arent that good.
Proof of this is the fact that next gen clocks and cores are indeed slightly less than current. Do you really think that companies would release a next gen console that cant handle current gen graphics and beyond? What would be the point? May aswell stick to ps3 and 360 then. As technology grows they find better ways that make computers/consoles work with themselves that has nothing to do with clocks and cores.
Originally Posted by marty370
KINECT SUCKS..................MOVE is way more accurate.
|
That was my point. lol?
Originally Posted by dantevergil
and we all humans can compare and compare consoles and pc by graphically for gaming..
and saying again upcoming consoles with those specs after releasing 2 years will have no future..!
|
I wish I could understand a word of what you just said. Sadly I dont