|
|
#1 |
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Probable Metldr dump
I dont know if its true but, tonight, a person named darkvolt put this into EOL.
Here is the link http://www.multiupload.com/YN4G8LJJK4 Here the link of the antivirus http://r.virscan.org/report/468a8837...7253505dc.html http://www.elotrolado.net/hilo_metld...irvete_1700840 edit: Please dont blame me, I just want to know what developers thinks about this.. Last edited by holita; 11-19-2011 at 11:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 4
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
1 post, newly registered, not suspicious at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 4
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'd be wary of downloading it regardless, seeing as anti virus software didn't pick up on the last virus leak.
http://translate.google.com/translat...irvete_1700840 There is some info on it, I'm skeptical, but in a way I'm hoping this isn't another scam. In those forums people are bringing up the name of Dark_Alex, although, somehow I doubt it. I think in some of the comments on one of the forums they're stating that metldr isn't updatable nor revokable, thus meaning that GeoHot's rootkey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 7
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
more than probably http://ps3devwiki.com/index.php?title=Dumping_Metldr was done a couple of weeks ago afaik its btldr/lv0 that a dump of is required which will need to be un encrypted but dumping metldr gives you your per console key which can be used to decrypt btldr again thats afaik
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 196
Likes: 58
Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
A chat on IRC last night, some interesting stuff Math is hinting lol.
[22:18:29] <Mathieulh> though I am totally not interested in pwning it [22:18:37] <Apocalyps> @TECH Send it to me [22:18:42] <zecoxao> Mathieulh, quick question [22:18:47] <zecoxao> syscon, owned or not? [22:18:51] <Mathieulh> luis353, does it look like I code for the money ? [22:19:00] <Apocalyps> Yes... [22:19:03] <luis353> no math just asking [22:19:07] <Mathieulh> zecoxao, yah I pwned that [22:19:11] <zecoxao> kk [22:19:20] <zecoxao> i asked Pockets69 to ask you that [22:19:29] <zecoxao> but he didn't tell me so... [22:19:32] <Apocalyps> One question [22:19:35] <randuev> Mathieulh: i undestand why you feel so about this whole ps3 thing, with people like that [22:19:36] <Mathieulh> easy when sony leave their sc fw key lying around [22:19:42] <Apocalyps> Can we switch Meta loader with Boot loader? [22:19:44] <zecoxao> :P [22:19:51] <zecoxao> thanks for the hint [22:20:02] <Mathieulh> Apocalyps, not if you want to brick [22:20:07] <Apocalyps> damn [22:20:11] <Mathieulh> not if you don't want to brick * [22:20:27] <randuev> Mathieulh: is HW key stored in e-fuses unique in each console? [22:21:03] <TechnoDon> only xbox has e-fuses [22:21:25] <Apocalyps> I wish the PS3 scene was as fast and progressing as the 360 scene [22:21:29] <Mathieulh> randuev, obviously yes [22:21:42] <Mathieulh> TechnoDon, the ps3 has some too [22:21:47] <Mathieulh> but they can only be programmed once [22:21:50] <randuev> Mathieulh: but it's only 48 bits [22:22:07] <randuev> 2^48 is enough? [22:22:10] <Mathieulh> randuev, what makes you say that ? [22:22:25] <randuev> well, i've read in cell docs [22:22:39] <Mathieulh> it's more than that [22:22:51] <Mathieulh> and cell docs does not reference everything [22:22:56] <Mathieulh> that part is NDAed [22:23:15] <Apocalyps> Wouldn't cell docks only reference the proccessor itself? [22:23:27] <randuev> that's unfortunate [22:23:59] <TechnoDon> i have sony 3.73 ofw if that helps.. [22:24:10] <TechnoDon> at Xbo [22:24:11] <Apocalyps> It doesn't [22:24:16] <TechnoDon> meh [22:24:33] <randuev> Mathieulh: did you end up making that hw device to read local storage or 3 exploits were pure software? [22:24:34] <luis353> math LV2Diag/ObjectiveSuite leaked lead to 3.73 CFW ? [22:24:39] <randuev> luis353: no [22:24:51] <Mathieulh> seriously wtf with the noobish questions? [22:24:55] <Apocalyps> objectivesuite useless without jig [22:24:56] <TechnoDon> how many times has that been asked now? [22:25:02] <Mathieulh> randuev, softwate [22:25:06] <Mathieulh> software* [22:25:23] <zecoxao> i was more interested in the syscon key [22:25:26] <Mathieulh> though randuev I suggest you to go the hardware root [22:25:31] <zecoxao> since i know it's hanging around [22:25:42] <randuev> Mathieulh: yeah, i am more keen on that as well [22:25:43] <Mathieulh> zecoxao, then look for it xD [22:25:54] <randuev> Mathieulh: i like soldering [22:25:57] <zecoxao> nah, i'm stupid and mentally ill xD [22:26:00] <Mathieulh> randuev, the sw approach is not easy [22:26:17] <Mathieulh> it relies on tricking the bl to load more than once [22:26:31] <zecoxao> that's what xxxxxx said [22:26:35] <randuev> Mathieulh: no doubt. i was hoping to spy on the bus, but clock is bit too fast for me [22:26:39] <Mathieulh> xxxxxx ? [22:26:49] <zecoxao> http://pastebin.com/xkXxk8fM [22:26:57] <zecoxao> but it wasn't for hw [22:27:01] <zecoxao> it was for bootldr [22:27:02] <Mathieulh> randuev, which bus are you looking at [22:27:04] <Mathieulh> ? * [22:27:19] <zecoxao> so he's probably wrong [22:27:37] <randuev> Mathieulh: ram/cell [22:27:48] <Mathieulh> rofl no wonder then [22:27:56] <Apocalyps> Another Stupid Question: What exactly is Runtime Secure Boot? [22:28:01] <Mathieulh> you are messing with the wrong bus [22:28:09] <Mathieulh> also the xdr clock speed can be descreased [22:28:12] <Apocalyps> Not really asking for an explanation, but what will it give us [22:28:33] <Mathieulh> Apocalyps, it allows to load metldr at runtime [22:28:39] <Mathieulh> it gets decrypted by the crypto engin [22:28:42] <Mathieulh> and authenticated [22:28:47] <Mathieulh> and then runs in a secure context [22:28:50] <Mathieulh> in isolation mode [22:28:53] <Apocalyps> So we still need to exploit that also, amirite? [22:28:56] <randuev> heh, i don't have sufficient docage for syscon [22:29:00] <zecoxao> so, underclock xdr... [22:29:08] <Mathieulh> Apocalyps, you need to exploit the isolated process [22:29:21] <Mathieulh> zecoxao, that's a way [22:29:23] <Mathieulh> there are others [22:29:36] <DarukBot> (title) [16:41] I think it works [16:41] I mean this is what I th - Pastebin.com [22:30:07] <Apocalyps> After exploiting the isolated process, we follow up to the authenticatation and decryption of the crypto engine? [22:30:48] <Apocalyps> In other words, would we need to exploit the process before the isolation? [22:30:58] <randuev> TechnoDon: you are wasting your time with this dh crap [22:31:01] <Mathieulh> if you want to go the hw route [22:31:10] <Mathieulh> do not try to read the shared LS directly [22:31:56] <randuev> Mathieulh: i am kinda confused about getting reliable readings out of cell cpu especially if local storage indeed is local [22:32:19] <Apocalyps> but shouldn't hardware authentication step go before it can execute on an isolated SPE? Why not just exploit the hardware unthentication? [22:32:21] <randuev> without removing covers off the cpu ) [22:32:28] <Mathieulh> randev the LS is only interconnected to the EIB [22:32:40] <Mathieulh> and the EIB can only be accessed from the ppu [22:33:07] <randuev> yeah, that's the problem, what to capture if it's all internal [22:33:08] <Mathieulh> Apocalyps, go for it then [22:33:21] <Mathieulh> it's not all internal [22:33:33] <Apocalyps> It would require modifying the hardware. :/ [22:33:37] <Mathieulh> the shared LS can be accessed from the ppu [22:33:40] <Apocalyps> Useless [22:33:51] <Mathieulh> but hell, I am saying too much [22:33:54] <Mathieulh> figure the rest yourselves [22:34:05] <randuev> Apocalyps: nothing is wrong with hardware tinkering [22:34:12] <zecoxao> hold on a sec [22:34:18] <zecoxao> THE Raziel? [22:34:19] <Apocalyps> Basically the hardware anthentication is just telling the spe that the hardware is tack? [22:34:23] <randuev> Mathieulh: thanks for tips, i'll try this way [22:34:29] <Apocalyps> *in tack [22:34:32] <MajorPSP1> lol [22:34:34] <_Raziel_> ops [22:34:41] <_Raziel_> not they but math [22:34:46] <zecoxao> the one that makes that emu? [22:34:58] <zecoxao> oh rly? [22:34:59] <Mathieulh> Apocalyps, there are freaking docs about it written by IBM, I suggest you read them [22:35:26] <Apocalyps> I'll read them... later [22:35:47] <MajorPSP1> not jk lol [22:36:03] <randuev> Mathieulh: about software route, can this all be done from otheros withour reboots of the system? [22:36:18] <Mathieulh> you need lv1 privs [22:36:29] <randuev> yeah, that can be patched [22:36:36] <Mathieulh> not really [22:36:47] <randuev> i mean in flash with nor flasher [22:36:54] <Mathieulh> yeah [22:37:08] <Mathieulh> you can update to a patched lv1 [22:37:10] <zecoxao> nor or nand xD [22:37:13] <Mathieulh> that is ****ing easy [22:37:46] <Mathieulh> also the bl fetches lv0 straight from nor [22:37:49] <Apocalyps> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/po...y/image002.gif [22:37:50] <Mathieulh> so you need to write your own [22:37:57] <Mathieulh> at least on a temporary basis [22:38:03] <Mathieulh> and the check has to fail [22:38:05] <randuev> no problem with temporary bricks [22:38:11] <Mathieulh> otherwise it will overwrite lv1 [22:38:32] <Mathieulh> that is if you get to reload it [22:38:41] <Mathieulh> which is HARD [22:39:03] <randuev> yeah, i am not that far into software side unfortunately [22:39:33] <Apocalyps> So this is secure runtime boot: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/po...y/image2-3.gif [22:39:59] <randuev> i was hoping that by malforming lv0 in the right way i could make it write needed info to flash [22:40:37] <randuev> but if i understand diagrams correctly, everything interesting gets wiped before passing on next lvl [22:40:53] <Apocalyps> Yes [22:41:13] <Mathieulh> lv0 "destroys" the spu at some point [22:41:44] <MajorPSP1> fr rly? lol [22:42:04] <Mathieulh> well it has to be terminated from ppu side [22:42:09] <Mathieulh> so err.... yeah [22:42:16] <Mathieulh> it is done quite early btw [22:42:43] <Apocalyps> ... [22:42:52] <randuev> ok, it seems that i have to look at lv0 in ida again [22:43:08] <Mathieulh> dumped it? [22:43:09] <randuev> last time it went over head [22:43:38] <randuev> or maybe it wasn't decrypted [22:43:58] <Mathieulh> how did you do the dump? [22:44:17] <Mathieulh> if it's straight from nor, it is encrypted [22:45:24] <randuev> that must be it [22:46:11] <zecoxao> TechnoDon, go get the keys lol [22:46:38] <Apocalyps> Ok? [22:48:12] <Apocalyps> crack37 [22:48:28] <Mathieulh> CV >>>>>>>>>>> terminate_isolated_spu [22:48:28] <Mathieulh> CV : error : already normal state [22:48:28] <Mathieulh> CV : error : stop isolated spu fail [22:48:28] <Mathieulh> CV >>>>>>>>>>> terminate_isolated_spu finished. [22:48:28] <Mathieulh> [22:48:29] <TechnoDon> ? [22:48:40] <Mathieulh> that's when the bootloader spu is "destroyed" [22:48:59] <zecoxao> is that on RAM? i believe i saw that on a peek poker once [22:49:06] <Mathieulh> no way [22:49:12] <Mathieulh> that's from lv0 [22:49:16] <zecoxao> oh ok [22:49:24] <zecoxao> i saw something else then [22:50:22] <Apocalyps> crypto isolation process [22:51:37] <DarukBot> (title) [C++] #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ printf( "n" "break - Pastebin.com [22:52:31] <Mathieulh> my code had a little more lines (and keys) than that one [22:52:54] <Apocalyps> How about you post a code? :P [22:53:46] <Mathieulh> Apocalyps, don't make me look for a hello world [22:53:55] <Apocalyps> ish dat guy geohotz [22:54:29] <zecoxao> deroad, Math has posted the lv0 version [22:54:30] <Apocalyps> Mathieulh, no one is telling you to look for hello world. just something labeled "3.73 keys here" [
__________________
Ps3hax is for me, like Reading a good book!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 202
Likes: 36
Liked 155 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
File is clean:
http://virusscan.jotti.org/nl/scanre...7348cfdee2d0c3 And it's not interesting to put a virus in a non executable file. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 1
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
More here:
http://translate.google.com/translat...te_1700840_s10 ************* [ - Post Merged - ] ************* Seems like "darkvolt" is the man in getting 3.6 CFW. Btw way, the trick using metldr is getting bl to run several times.. ************* [ - Post Merged - ] ************* THis is the key in the dumps: erk: C0 CE FE 84 C2 27 F7 5B D0 7A 7E B8 46 50 9F 93 B2 38 E7 70 DA CB 9F F4 A3 88 F8 12 48 2B E2 1B riv: 47 EE 74 54 E4 77 4C C9 B8 96 0C 7B 59 F4 C1 4D pub: C2 D4 AA F3 19 35 50 19 AF 99 D4 4E 2B 58 CA 29 25 2C 89 12 3D 11 D6 21 8F 40 B1 38 CA B2 9B 71 01 F3 AE B7 2A 97 50 19 R: 80 6E 07 8F A1 52 97 90 CE 1A AE 02 BA DD 6F AA A6 AF 74 17 n: E1 3A 7E BC 3A CC EB 1C B5 6C C8 60 FC AB DB 6A 04 8C 55 E1 K: BA 90 55 91 68 61 B9 77 ED CB ED 92 00 50 92 F6 6C 7A 3D 8D Da: C5 B2 BF A1 A4 13 DD 16 F2 6D 31 C0 F2 ED 47 20 DC FB 06 70 ************* [ - Post Merged - ] ************* My last post.. http://www.ps3sos.com/showthread.php...p-por-Darkvolt |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
a good way to be anon is by making a new account so don't rule anything out.
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|