|
|
#21 |
|
Lord Loren Soth
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dargaard Keep
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1,972
Liked 1,209 Times in 676 Posts
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
agreed a way to downgrade would be perfect, sure people will whine about not being able to playing the newest games but if that is what you want you would probably be happier on ofw
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Homebrew Developer
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Outher Heaven
Posts: 351
Likes: 67
Liked 345 Times in 120 Posts
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
people want a cfw just for playing backups and mods games.
i was one of those that helped people to ruin games, like MW2 for ps3 or MoH for PSP. when i realized that (it was too late), i stopped relasing things as ps devs have done for the ps scene. now i'm not saying that the ps scene is dead, but i'd like to see more homebrews as kakaroto is doing. if people really care about homebrews, they would remain on 3.55 (sorry for this OT) Last edited by deroad; 06-14-2011 at 06:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() |
yes an easier downgrade would be a better idea but, then again we can use it as a little dual boot method for people on Ofw 3.65 and using that qa flag to downgrade anytime i guess :D
************* [ - Post Merged - ] *************
and thats a shame. i understand we've only just made our long awaited CFWs and jailbreaks we'd all be waiting for but ever since of the release came out i've not seen but one or two (or couple of good ones) pieces of homebrew been released since then and im pretty upset about that. :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 2,087
Liked 2,451 Times in 1,390 Posts
Mentioned: 139 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
lets see its a CFW is not out of the equation, it is by the same method as before using private keys to sign files etc that won't work anymore, we will have to rely on unsigned code again like on the 3.41 days, new exploits will be found, but i would say that QA flagging is the next in line.
__________________
<eussNL> judge: ´so why did you torrent 5 million AVI of women moaning´ <eussNL> <TizzyT> i dont judge if it sounds good i listen |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#25 | |
|
Senior Member
![]()
|
Is it the button combination that Mathieulh didn't release? And what's this talk about Tokens? I'm so clueless when it comes to QA flagging. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 2,087
Liked 2,451 Times in 1,390 Posts
Mentioned: 139 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
what is preventing us from flagging 3.56+ machines is the ECDSA signature, 3.60 3.61 and 3.65 need that signature in order to build the token.
the button combo i suspect it can be found easly after the machine is QA flagged. the token is needed to flag the machine, but we need a valid token, after the token is set the flag is set also, and you will have a valid QA flagged machine.
__________________
<eussNL> judge: ´so why did you torrent 5 million AVI of women moaning´ <eussNL> <TizzyT> i dont judge if it sounds good i listen |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#27 |
|
Homebrew Developer
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Outher Heaven
Posts: 351
Likes: 67
Liked 345 Times in 120 Posts
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i just updated the tutorial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Homebrew Developer
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Outher Heaven
Posts: 351
Likes: 67
Liked 345 Times in 120 Posts
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Updated again and added how to make or reverse a PSL1GHT PARAM SFO as asked on a forum
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|