Go Back  
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-02-2011   #41
r.storm85
Member
 
r.storm85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 168
Likes: 4
Liked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Damn this time..light years stuff is a total mindf***. Really interesting though.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
r.storm85 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011   #42
KillerBug
Senior Member
 
KillerBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 148
Liked 1,100 Times in 619 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by TizzyT View Post
Hmm I think you have it backward.
In an experiment using 2 atomic clocks one on the ground and on in a plane, while both clocks started at exactly the same time. When the plane landed the clock was faster then the atomic clock that was on the ground so in turn should the things outside be slowed down???
That probably had something to do with the effects of gravity throughout the flight.

The theory is that the speed of light cannot be broken, and as such, the universe will slow things inside a fast moving object to prevent breaches. For instance, if you were on a spaceship going 100MPH slower than the speed of light and you fired a gun towards the front of the ship, that bullet would go faster than the speed of light...but since this is impossible, we know that time would be slowed so that the bullet could not go faster than 99.9999999MPH.

http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/gps-relativity.asp
__________________
KillerBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011   #43
TizzyT
Homebrew Developer
 
TizzyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA-Unfortunately Sucks A$$
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 1,007
Liked 810 Times in 476 Posts
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TizzyT
Originally Posted by KillerBug View Post
That probably had something to do with the effects of gravity throughout the flight.

The theory is that the speed of light cannot be broken, and as such, the universe will slow things inside a fast moving object to prevent breaches. For instance, if you were on a spaceship going 100MPH slower than the speed of light and you fired a gun towards the front of the ship, that bullet would go faster than the speed of light...but since this is impossible, we know that time would be slowed so that the bullet could not go faster than 99.9999999MPH.

http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/gps-relativity.asp
Well its still not proven but have you heard of the neutrinos, lol. They apparently got it to go faster then light. Also the speed of the bullet is not a constant while light speed is constant(apparently).
__________________
If you are going to promote TB at least do it right!!!, or better yet DON'T!!!

Last edited by TizzyT; 12-02-2011 at 11:37 PM.
TizzyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011   #44
KillerBug
Senior Member
 
KillerBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 148
Liked 1,100 Times in 619 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by TizzyT View Post
Well its still not proven but have you heard of the neutrinos, lol. They apparently got it to go faster then light. Also the speed of the bullet is not a constant while light speed is constant(apparently).
Certain particles contain internal functions; we can see things happening within them at a certain rate of speed. When we accelerate these particles to the edge of the speed of light, we can see that these internal functions take much longer from out perspective.

As to the airplane, I just realized...if it was flying against the rotation of the earth then the plane was going slower than the ground; not faster.
__________________
KillerBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011   #45
TizzyT
Homebrew Developer
 
TizzyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA-Unfortunately Sucks A$$
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 1,007
Liked 810 Times in 476 Posts
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TizzyT
Originally Posted by KillerBug View Post
Certain particles contain internal functions; we can see things happening within them at a certain rate of speed. When we accelerate these particles to the edge of the speed of light, we can see that these internal functions take much longer from out perspective.

As to the airplane, I just realized...if it was flying against the rotation of the earth then the plane was going slower than the ground; not faster.
LOL huh...I mean i don't think rotation of the earth will have a significat effect on atomic clocks, maybe wrong. I'll go look for the experiment to source.

PS: wow my memory must be super bad at this point as I just looked up the experiment I was talking about and it states that the time in the plane is slower....hmm how the hell did I get faster from???

Source: http://www.alternativephysics.org/bo...xperiments.htm

also read that this methods measures were invalidated....
__________________
If you are going to promote TB at least do it right!!!, or better yet DON'T!!!

Last edited by TizzyT; 12-02-2011 at 11:59 PM.
TizzyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011   #46
KillerBug
Senior Member
 
KillerBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 148
Liked 1,100 Times in 619 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by TizzyT View Post
LOL huh...I mean i don't think rotation of the earth will have a significat effect on atomic clocks, maybe wrong. I'll go look for the experiment to source.

PS: wow my memory must be super bad at this point as I just looked up the experiment I was talking about and it states that the time in the plane is slower....hmm how the hell did I get faster from???

Source: http://www.alternativephysics.org/bo...xperiments.htm

also read that this methods measures were invalidated....
Granted...it is not proven, but nothing in science is ever really proven. This theory does have a lot of evidence to back it.

The universe can be crazy to think about...both movement and mass effect time...our entire solar system could last a shorter time than it takes some alien on a distant space ship to eat lunch.
__________________
KillerBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011   #47
japsander
 
japsander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: up sh*t creek without a paddle
Posts: 7,641
Likes: 2,745
Liked 5,249 Times in 2,509 Posts
Mentioned: 356 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by TizzyT View Post
Well its still not proven but have you heard of the neutrinos, lol. They apparently got it to go faster then light. Also the speed of the bullet is not a constant while light speed is constant(apparently).
They rechecked the neutrino data and came to the conclusion they had it wrong
__________________
Originally Posted by <GregoryRasputin>
There is nothing more epic, than blowing a Zombies head off, whilst having a poo
japsander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011   #48
TizzyT
Homebrew Developer
 
TizzyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA-Unfortunately Sucks A$$
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 1,007
Liked 810 Times in 476 Posts
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TizzyT
Originally Posted by japsander View Post
They rechecked the neutrino data and came to the conclusion they had it wrong
Hmm I didn't know they invalidated the "SECOND" experiment as well. Do you just mean the first experiment or have the second one been debunked as well? last I checked the second one has the sensors closer together to get more accurate readings and to nullify some outside interference and was said to have come back with the same results as the first one claimed.
__________________
If you are going to promote TB at least do it right!!!, or better yet DON'T!!!
TizzyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011   #49
KillerBug
Senior Member
 
KillerBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 148
Liked 1,100 Times in 619 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by TizzyT View Post
Hmm I didn't know they invalidated the "SECOND" experiment as well. Do you just mean the first experiment or have the second one been debunked as well? last I checked the second one has the sensors closer together to get more accurate readings and to nullify some outside interference and was said to have come back with the same results as the first one claimed.
It hasn't been invalidated, but it hasn't been independently confirmed either.

One of the more reasonable possibilities that has been postulated is that the theoretical laws don't actually say that nothing can go faster than the speed of light. They say that there is a theoretical limit to how fast something can move. Theory has generally been that the speed limit is the speed of light since nothing had ever been seen to go faster than light in a vacuum...but it is entirely possible that neutrinos can go faster than the speed of light, and thus they go at the universal speed limit, or even that some unknown thing (maybe dark matter) goes even faster, and thus that would be the universal speed limit. This would actually fit into existing theories reasonably well, as neutrinos have less activity inside of them than photons, and if you go back to the space ship and a gun example, it would make sense that they could go faster because of this. This is of course argued because of 1987A; but there were a lot of other things effecting the particles from supernova 1987A so it isn't the most concrete argument.
__________________
KillerBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011   #50
TizzyT
Homebrew Developer
 
TizzyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA-Unfortunately Sucks A$$
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 1,007
Liked 810 Times in 476 Posts
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TizzyT
Originally Posted by KillerBug View Post
It hasn't been invalidated, but it hasn't been independently confirmed either.

One of the more reasonable possibilities that has been postulated is that the theoretical laws don't actually say that nothing can go faster than the speed of light. They say that there is a theoretical limit to how fast something can move. Theory has generally been that the speed limit is the speed of light since nothing had ever been seen to go faster than light in a vacuum...but it is entirely possible that neutrinos can go faster than the speed of light, and thus they go at the universal speed limit, or even that some unknown thing (maybe dark matter) goes even faster, and thus that would be the universal speed limit. This would actually fit into existing theories reasonably well, as neutrinos have less activity inside of them than photons, and if you go back to the space ship and a gun example, it would make sense that they could go faster because of this. This is of course argued because of 1987A; but there were a lot of other things effecting the particles from supernova 1987A so it isn't the most concrete argument.
As I remember it the supernova was detect by NASA before the supernova was visible on their telescopes. They used a jell like substance to catch some particle that came from the supernova and that was how NASA was able to detect the supernova before it was visible....leading to the conclusion that the particles that NASA caught are faster then the speed of light.
__________________
If you are going to promote TB at least do it right!!!, or better yet DON'T!!!
TizzyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



PS3Hax.net is Copyright © 2010-2013.
Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. All Trademarks and images are owned by their respected owners.
Posts and links are subject to each author on this forum and are no way affiliated with the operations and/or opinions of ps3hax.net
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.