|
|
#1 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 81
Likes: 2
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
GregoryRasputin and his gorilla
Hello.
1) Here I receive an infraction for "thread derailment" from GregoryRasputin. What the ****? Here is GregoryRasputin showing his "supreme" argumenting: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...idgregory.png/ What the ****? I receive an infraction because I disagree with him? The funny part: Reason: ------- Thread Derailment I really don't enjoy giving infractions, it is the bane of my day, i could be doing other things, more important things, which i cannot do, because i keep having to deal with people insulting and attacking me. Did you ever consider people keep "insulting" and attacking you, because you are afterall 1) ABUSING your moderator power, and 2) you actually do possess quite low intelligence, atleast from my point of view? Will you get "offended" yet again, like the narcist you probably are? (or a very insecure boy, take your guesses!) Stop being a passive-aggressive nutcase, and maybe, MAYBE, karma will give you something else than ****? "Supermoderator" NO, "Superabuser" ...now that's a definate YES! Your line with thread derailing is very small. Do you even know what derailing means? And supposedly as you don't, here, let me help you: derailing means shifting from context A to context B when such is inappropriate. 2) And another holy crusader, fighting for all that is righteouss and just: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...buttbuddy.png/ So GregoryRasputin first you hop in a big man's shoes and then you chicken? Fulfill what you sign for, you chicken. Call your gorilla back and fight 1on1. "Insulted other member". I guess "the rules" only apply for us non-moderators? Please specify what in my text is oh so insulting? GregoryRasputin insults (truly, what is considered an insult, not plausible-deniable "getting offended" like he does) daily people, e.g. those who stand on the otherside than him on TB views; yet he doesn't get infracted/warned/demoted? What the **** yet again... You, who ever keeps an eye on this "Supermoderator", keep your dog on a leash ffs. ![]() These two don't deserve their status. Burn in hell for all eternity for your sins or seek absolution. Your choice, I would prefer the former tho. Why you feel the ban/infraction was unjust (why should we unban you)? 1) "Thread derailment" -- bs. Just GregoryRasputin abusing his moderator privilege. 2) "Insulting other member" -- bs. GregoryRasputing deserves all that he gets. He uses plausible deniability for getting "offended", and then gives me a warning for what? My $0.02 Last edited by viljo; 12-12-2011 at 04:29 PM. |
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#2 | ||
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: up sh*t creek without a paddle
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,771
Liked 5,292 Times in 2,530 Posts
Mentioned: 360 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
ok, first of all, i did not see you had your original infraction for this post you made (its hard to infract a specific post after you hide the original text)
i infracted you for this post that you shortly edited out to hide. i dont care who you were talking to, member or staff, the result would be the same. remember, YOU were the first to throw insults and make things personal, taking it off topic i.e. thread derailment a simple appeal thread or PM would have gotten the infraction from me reversed as it seems you had already received one instead of jumping on your high horse and screaming victim. and FYI, nobody "called this gorilla out" and i do not appreciate being called his "b*tch". (he is mine) he is quite capable of fighting his own battles without my help as am i. fyi i had zero problems with you at all until you created one with me in thread. if you failed to try and sort it out maturely then you deserve to keep the infraction you received from me especially as you use terms such as "Burn in hell for all eternity for your sins" or as i like to call, infracting someone who clearly deserves it, which you have just proven edit. it seems you did not even receive an infraction from @GregoryRasputin at all, it was a warning, 0 points
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
Likes: (6) |
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia US
Posts: 3,064
Likes: 1,629
Liked 1,993 Times in 934 Posts
Mentioned: 198 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Wow most of the people that ask for an infraction/ban appeal are smart enough to know to do it in a mature manner. I looked over both posts and I agree with Greg. Do I always agree with him? Also no. "Keep him on his leash?" I should issue another infraction just for that.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,988
Likes: 371
Liked 8,045 Times in 1,247 Posts
Mentioned: 585 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Where does it say infraction?
It clearly says: "You have received a warning..." by Greg. You clearly overreacted, then you were infracted by another moderator. Thread closed. |
|
|
|
Likes: (5) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|