|
|
#161 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 207
Likes: 125
Liked 39 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Stop all this false hopes guys...it will never be a reality
Team TrueBlue had the new public keys, that way they could decrypt new eboots !! & if we should believe that theories talking about debug PS3 eboot's, non signed eboots, dumping decrypted eboots from the RAM .....bla bla bla This will never explain how they could decrypt 1.20 pkg update for Skyrim !!! wich as I knew is signed with 4.00 keys !! such thing is absolutly impossible without new public keys !!! I really want to believe you but....it's a lost war from the begining !!! It's just my mind, every one is free to say what he want to say !!!! Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#163 | |||
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
No offence Bro, but before you start flaming you should make sure that your understanding of the statements are what you think they are. As you can see from the others they understood what I meant perfectly. ************* [ - Post Merged - ] *************
![]() ************* [ - Post Merged - ] *************
Last edited by Calliope; 05-04-2012 at 08:34 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: at my computer
Posts: 460
Likes: 186
Liked 246 Times in 137 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Maybe I'm an ass that can't understand broken English. But when you regurgitate the same post multiple times, and it's others quotes. Even you must admit it could easily put you in the troll catagory. Especially since you started slandering the wiki, and those that maintain it.(well respected/reputable people
@euss
and
@defyboy
)
Last edited by Ubefuct; 05-04-2012 at 09:14 AM. Reason: spacing |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (3) |
|
|
#165 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
BTW, the reason why I have posted the same information many times is so the message and the information does not die in the killed and bashing threads! I am not here to get eFame or anything of the sort. I am there to contribute and receive more knowledge and most importantly spread the information needed. Remember freedom of information is the cornerstone of democracy. Last edited by Calliope; 05-04-2012 at 09:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#166 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: at my computer
Posts: 460
Likes: 186
Liked 246 Times in 137 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It may not have been you're intention, by"questioning and reflecting" to "bash" anyone. Although you also took it personal when you were questioned about your remarks.
As this is in the technical thread and not the drama thread I'll refrain from posting again. Please reread you're posts before hitting submit. As you claim it may not be your intent to bash, but you can see how it can be taken that way |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
If trublue really have hardware to capture the decrypted eboots from ram is it possible to write some math equation that can figure out the cypher numbers that makes it encrypted?
if there is more than 1 number, do it with multiple eboots and there should only be 1 encryption. Maybe the math isnt possible for this but it is just a random idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 903
Likes: 303
Liked 447 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 79 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
decrypted eboot -> encryption keys + algorithm -> trueblue encrypted eboot decrypted eboot -> encryption keys + algorithm ->trueblue encrypted eboot decrypted eboot -> encryption keys + algorithm ->trueblue encrypted eboot But I am afraid that wont work... If we had both the decrypted and encrypted eboot, we could see how the encryption affected the transformation, and make some math equation perhaps that at the very least limited the possible used values, even though that still wouldnt be easy... But we dont have the decrypted eboot, we only have the encrypted... We cant - even with multiple eboots - figure out how they have been changed, when we dont know how any of them looked looked prior to the change. Its kinda like, if we stand with the numbers: 111 1667 314 And are told that one value is added to each of those, and we should figure out what value they had before anything had been added to them.. We have to unknowns in the equation, both the starting value and the variable that transformed them... Only thing we could deduce, was that the value added was max 110, if all value started out as positive integers >.< Sorry for spelling it out so obvious. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 921
Likes: 69
Liked 476 Times in 249 Posts
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|