[lordv]

Originally Posted by Ada Love Lace For quicker look: CEX2DEX pro versus con PROS Using the features of a debug console Executing FSELFs Downgrading (to minver of that SKU/type) CONS Loosing Retail functionality(You could always just mod a DEX PUP and boom you got dvd,ps store etc) PSN not possible -> You can't play online(Hmmmm... LIE) More Stress to the console (Phats prone to YLOD) (Rly???) You can't play backups (obvious exception of MultiMan 3.55 DEX) (Lie, check a little folder known as ps3gen) Easily detectable and banned. Can you be more explicit on your recent edits thanks you. Also you said something i second about Euss being really essential to one of the best wiki ever made if not the best. but sadly there are also fews page/infos everyone should read with cautious. But names shouldn t matter in this thread so much, good or not so good contributions. Last time i didn t use the right words as it should have been by quoting this page. I will ask you also to complete about this (unban): Cons: About :Easily detectable and banned. Thanks you in advance. (there are about CONS something i think like "giving too much power" or "attention focus into somewhere it shouln t" but i m still in the process to think about it.)

Well as for the banning: $ONY maintains a list of the DEX Console IDs manufactured and supplied to developers so they know if your debug is one of the "Original" debugs. However they don't check for this(or else i would be left with only one debug :P)
Also what i meant is that about 3,5 i am not sure, but the rest are LIES.

[luqi]

So what ... ,

as i can see is cex2dex the really good Solution for those who sits tight on 3.55.

Wait for a tut !!!

[cookie42]

Originally Posted by lordv Check the wiki and you will see. 3 pros to cex2dex'ing and 5 cons(could be more) including a)no backups b) no retail blahblah c)no psn Actually on a dex a)backups are easy b) You can get back the blahblah by a simple meddling with the pup,like i did(and i suspect many more) c)oh rly? then i must have been using a clone of the psn

If you're going to edit the wiki, please provide evidence, rather than simply stating it's wrong. At first glance, your edit looks like a trolls work (no offence).

[lordv]

Originally Posted by cookie42 If you're going to edit the wiki, please provide evidence, rather than simply stating it's wrong. At first glance, your edit looks like a trolls work (no offence).

I did it like this because they too don't provide evidence. All i can say is do the cex2dex and confirm what i say. I can't prove it otherwise. Do you want a vid? I can do a vid but then you will have to trust me that it's not the real dex the one i will make the video with.

[cookie42]

Originally Posted by lordv I did it like this because they too don't provide evidence. All i can say is do the cex2dex and confirm what i say. I can't prove it otherwise.

Well you're discussing it here, why not contribute some info while you're at it? Although someone else ended up reverting it anyway.

[lordv]

Originally Posted by cookie42 Well you're discussing it here, why not contribute some info while you're at it?Although someone else ended up reverting it anyway.

What kind of info you want?

[ocam]

now let's wait for euss and his comment

[Ada Love Lace]

Originally Posted by DEFAULTDNB The date on the CEX DEX proof vid says 8/8 @2:14 Is that a deliberate mistake or proof it was done a long time ago (I.e: last year)?

8/8 is summer, and during summer, people from different country can meet.
Video is just video, it should not be important, when or which context it was done. It s trivial to think about that, if it was today or two years ago.

The leak context of the method is important, why it s good or bad to have this and to discuss about it, not by referring to someone s video.

[Medox]

Originally Posted by DEFAULTDNB The date on the CEX DEX proof vid says 8/8 @2:14 Is that a deliberate mistake or proof it was done a long time ago (I.e: last year)?

you see an incorrect date instead of a correct multiman logo/icon. that logo is used only with multiman 04.xx.xx, meaning the video can't be older than january 2012.

funny conspirationists are funny.

[Pingoo]

I'm not believing what lordv is saying until he proves his points somehow. But if his claims turn out to be true, devs even sabatoged the wiki and even the wiki can't be trusted anymore. What a sorry ass scene this has turned out to be