[stussy1]

lol another 14 pages of crap
has anyone got this working
couldnt be bothered scrolling thru
14 pages

[CaptainCPS-X]

Originally Posted by H3avyRa1n can someone take a look at this line in the source code? I don't get what was intended here: void loader_sprx(const char* PATH_PRX) { sys_prx_id_t prx_id ; write_message ("Loading a prx ... "); prx_id = sys_prx_load_module(PATH_PRX,0, NULL); if (prx_id < CELL_OK) { write_message ("Failed LOADING\n"); return; } I really don't get it.

I haven't read the whole thread but, this part is supposed to initialize a 'sys_prx_id_t' structure / variable named 'prx_id'.

Now, this part: 'prx_id = sys_prx_load_module(PATH_PRX,0, NULL);' will try to load the PRX file and any returned value will be stored in 'prx_id'.

If the returned value into 'prx_id' is lower than 'CELL_OK', that means it is 0, or failed.

SeeYa!

[H3avyRa1n]

Originally Posted by CaptainCPS-X I haven't read the whole thread but, this part is supposed to initialize a 'sys_prx_id_t' structure / variable named 'prx_id'. Now, this part: 'prx_id = sys_prx_load_module(PATH_PRX,0, NULL);' will try to load the PRX file and any returned value will be stored in 'prx_id'. If the returned value into 'prx_id' is lower than 'CELL_OK', that means it is 0, or failed. SeeYa!

but it shouldn't be something like this?

sys_prx_id_t * prx_id

[oPolo]

Originally Posted by H3avyRa1n Originally Posted by CaptainCPS-X I haven't read the whole thread but, this part is supposed to initialize a 'sys_prx_id_t' structure / variable named 'prx_id'. Now, this part: 'prx_id = sys_prx_load_module(PATH_PRX,0, NULL);' will try to load the PRX file and any returned value will be stored in 'prx_id'. If the returned value into 'prx_id' is lower than 'CELL_OK', that means it is 0, or failed. SeeYa! but it shouldn't be something like this? sys_prx_id_t * prx_id

No, if you write "sys_prx_id_t * prx_id" you will declare a pointer to a structure, and not an actual struct. You cannot store anything in a pointer(besides the address it points at ~~). We need an actual sys_prx_id_t struct to store values of the members in. We could afterwards make a pointer to a struct as is often done, to access it through a pointer.

The thing with structures is that they can be passed by value in ANSI C in function calls, but that is immensely ineffective, pushing all the members of the struct on the stack before the method call is invoked, etc ( ._.)

So normally you end up passing the structure by reference in function calls, and well, then you work on a structure pointer anyway at that point, as you declared.

So, the later line of code:
prx_id = sys_prx_load_module(PATH_PRX,0, NULL);
Actually returns a struct and not an address to one, I guess (another thing of ANSI C, returning structs by value are also allowed).

[H3avyRa1n]

Originally Posted by oPolo No, if you write "sys_prx_id_t * prx_id" you will declare a pointer to a structure, and not an actual struct. You cannot store anything in a pointer(besides the address it points at ~~). We need an actual sys_prx_id_t struct to store values of the members in. We could afterwards make a pointer to a struct as is often done, to access it through a pointer. The thing with structures is that they can be passed by value in ANSI C in function calls, but that is immensely ineffective, pushing all the members of the struct on the stack before the method call is invoked, etc ( ._.) So normally you end up passing the structure by reference in function calls, and well, then you work on a structure pointer anyway at that point, as you declared.

much clearer now,thanks!

[AsSiTcH]

Originally Posted by stussy1 lol another 14 pages of crap has anyone got this working couldnt be bothered scrolling thru 14 pages

Another lazy doochebag. I got it working.

[danixleet]

It works on my 3.55 DEX ... But i can't get dev_blind via pkg or MM working on dex 4.20, any suggestions... ?

[hartmann]

I tried with fifa 12, and give a error (80010017) back to xmb

[harryoke]

Originally Posted by danixleet It works on my 3.55 DEX ... But i can't get dev_blind via pkg or MM working on dex 4.20, any suggestions... ?

try ....modified sprx in dex 3.55 then update to dex 4.20 via xmb not recovery...as stated in readme that recovery will replace modified file...load new game via dex bdemu ...downgrade to dex 3.55 see if you have a dump

[Abkarino]

Originally Posted by harryoke try ....modified sprx in dex 3.55 then update to dex 4.20 via xmb not recovery...as stated in readme that recovery will replace modified file...load new game via dex bdemu ...downgrade to dex 3.55 see if you have a dump

This will not work since updating from XMB will replace all dev_flash files also so we will remove the modified sprx