|
|
#41 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 454
Liked 329 Times in 234 Posts
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 51
Liked 62 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@JustThatDude
yes i know but only the decryption ones since the fail was fixed...
My point is that they also must have the lv0 keys (not shared with the peeps) how else would they be able to patch the chain of trust with their custom keysets? After reading the pastie more carefully it would seem this was the used method in jfw... Last edited by r07f1; 10-21-2012 at 11:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Homebrew Developer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 112
Likes: 166
Liked 181 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You ever heard the word "EXPLOID" ??
Damn god, every one is so fixed on lv0 -.- Peoples or user think there can't be a other way to obtain keys then decrypting lv0. Open your mind. |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 51
Liked 62 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@cfwprpht
i'm sorry... my area is more Software Engeneering than Computer Science however this pastie specifically talks about lv0.self with metadata sploit... care to explain for us noobz?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 454
Liked 329 Times in 234 Posts
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#46 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 454
Liked 329 Times in 234 Posts
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 51
Liked 62 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm talking about the chain of trust...
An untouched 356 lv0 would not be able to decrypt anything signed with 355 keys... |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Homebrew Developer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 112
Likes: 166
Liked 181 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That i meant with open your mind. But anyway, if i would tell you that i can run a liblv2 of a 4.21 OFW on a 3.55 CFW would you belive it ?? The same like for my alpha sort hack. Some peoples claimed that i don't have this hack and that im a noob and i can't code. Well....to the topic: To your last post, lv0 DO NOT decrypt everything dude. Or what you think for what appldr is there ? Or what you think how rogero could add 3.60 keys to a 3.55 CFW without having the lv0 static key's ?? ![]() No offence but you miss some aknowledge about the whole sys and im not here to teach other's. There for we have a wiki or a lot of post's in other thread's. Again no offence. |
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#49 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 51
Liked 62 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@cfwprpht
not probz i am a little stoned but after i looked with atention to the 355 boot order i recognize my mistake sorry about that...
of course i would... i have no reason to call you a phony mate Peace! Anyway i will STFU now... Last edited by r07f1; 10-21-2012 at 12:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 12
Liked 80 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Yeah, um, this isn't the ony way to get bootldr. And you don't need lv0 to make a 3.56+ firmware with 3.55 keys either.
Last edited by master737373; 10-21-2012 at 12:39 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|