[ryant001]

Originally Posted by master737373 The thing is, the wiki has info on it that's blocked off to people without certain..."priviledges." And I doubt the wiki has this info.

Lol so much for freedom of information and the "it's all documented on the wiki,you just need to read" phrase....
Funny that devs tells us that we need to study/do things on our own but then hide all the important info, forcing us to start from the beginning all over again.

[master737373]

Originally Posted by ryant001 Lol so much for freedom of information and the "it's all documented on the wiki,you just need to read" phrase....

Yup, learned that the hard way.

[An_FiS]

well if bluedick just released their cfw and 3k3y is releasing **** (small key retrieval pkg) then if there is a true 4.21/4.25 cfw that rebug is working on then they need to make some haste and get with the releasing or be left out.... but someone did an exploit very simular to this to pwn bootldr how else would you get a resigned lv0.self? bluedick figured it... just saying

[ryant001]

Originally Posted by An_FiS well if bluedick just released their cfw and 3k3y is releasing **** (small key retrieval pkg) then if there is a true 4.21/4.25 cfw that rebug is working on then they need to make some haste and get with the releasing or be left out.... but someone did an exploit very simular to this to pwn bootldr how else would you get a resigned lv0.self?

Simple, they used the method that works and that it's not being publicly shared(read:not this one from the pastie).

Originally Posted by master737373 Yup, learned that the hard way.

So, is there any way that a guy like me that just likes to learn things can get this kind of info from somewhere/someone?

[master737373]

Originally Posted by ryant001 Simple, they used the method that works and that it's not being publicly shared(read:not this one from the pastie). So, is there any way that a guy like me that just likes to learn things can get this kind of info from somewhere/someone?

Not unless you just ask questions to someone willing to teach. But I doubt they'll give out access to it. Note: there's a lot on the wiki that's wrong. When I was reversing lv1 and lv2, more than half the documentations were wrong.

[An_FiS]

Originally Posted by master737373 Not unless you just ask questions to someone willing to teach. But I doubt they'll give out access to it. Note: there's a lot on the wiki that's wrong. When I was reversing lv1 and lv2, more than half the documentations were wrong.

That's because their are two ps3 dev wiki's one for the fanboys thats all jacked'up and one for the devs thats all locked up.

[hellsing9]

Originally Posted by master737373 Not unless you just ask questions to someone willing to teach. But I doubt they'll give out access to it. Note: there's a lot on the wiki that's wrong. When I was reversing lv1 and lv2, more than half the documentations were wrong.

It's a wiki, you can edit what you found that's wrong even you have talkpage to make more corrections.
But it's easier to ***** how ****ed up is the wiki instead of doing proper corrections.

Ohhh the *devs*...*sigh* (SIC)

[master737373]

Originally Posted by hellsing9 It's a wiki, you can edit what you found that's wrong even you have talkpage to make more corrections. But it's easier to ***** how ****ed up is the wiki instead of doing proper corrections. Ohhh the *devs*...*sigh* (SIC)

No, cause you have people that "run" the wiki that will change your edits and put it back to the way they were. I tried. The wiki comes with drama.

[hellsing9]

Originally Posted by master737373 No, cause you have people that "run" the wiki that will change your edits and put it back to the way they were. I tried. The wiki comes with drama.

I repeat use your eyes to read and i will remark this:

1) Wiki has surveillance almost 24/7 from euss and defy in charge of hosting.
2) Any edit is saw by everyone so is quite transparent.
3) Anyone can edit and re-edit again some entries but some are subject to moderation.

This being said, seems like you don't trust @euss
Well i do trust him. So instead use *people who RUN the wiki..* just point the finger and *expose* who you think is ****ing all up.

Kudos.

[ryant001]

Originally Posted by An_FiS That's because their are two ps3 dev wiki's one for the fanboys thats all jacked'up and one for the devs thats all locked up.

So what's even the point in having a wiki for the public if the info is left false or incomplete on purpose?
Just call it a file repository(not even that now) and be done.
How are we supposed to get things done if we can't access even the info that we need, all the while with the devs that do know things throwing us cryptic hints and laughing behind our backs?