[jjkkyu]

a rush update with the new keys:

v1.1
add resign to 3.55cfw
add keys to 4.25
fix some script logic

special thanks to haz367

[concretecork]

@jjkkyu thank you for this tool. Can't wait to try it out

[kiwitothemax]

Originally Posted by jjkkyu a rush update with the new keys: v1.1 add resign to 3.55cfw add keys to 4.25 fix some script logic http://rghost.net/41270706 special thanks to haz367

Champion

[jjkkyu]

v1.11

fix resign 3.60-4.25 to 3.55

[elpaso666]

Originally Posted by jjkkyu v1.11 fix resign 3.60-4.25 to 3.55 http://rghost.net/41271766

Hi,

as far as I can tell I see a little bit of logical mistake in the script

in :disc355 (I did not check any of the others) - FixELF proceed only if the EBOOT.ELF does not exist. That means if you use first option for only decrypting to ELF and then try to resign the FixELF then it is just skipped, because it is part only of first condition which is not processed in this case


and one more question - does it matter if you put "33" in the ELF file and then edit PARAM.SFO to 3.41? Normally I change EBOOT.BIN to "34" so it coreponds with PARAM.SFO...


Jakub

[jjkkyu]

Originally Posted by elpaso666 Hi, as far as I can tell I see a little bit of logical mistake in the script in :disc355 (I did not check any of the others) - FixELF proceed only if the EBOOT.ELF does not exist. That means if you use first option for only decrypting to ELF and then try to resign the FixELF then it is just skipped, because it is part only of first condition which is not processed in this case and one more question - does it matter if you put "33" in the ELF file and then edit PARAM.SFO to 3.41? Normally I change EBOOT.BIN to "34" so it coreponds with PARAM.SFO... Jakub

Oh, my god, I hate rush update.
Elf fix doesn't relate to sfo, mate.
'33' may allow it working on 3.41.
Script will be improved when i finish current work.

v1.12
http://rghost.net/41272482

fix a script logic.

[elpaso666]

Originally Posted by jjkkyu oh, my god, I hate rush update. elf fix doesn't relate to sfo, mate.

ok if it is not related, then your part with fixelf is ok but not the logical structure of script

anyway im having trouble here, but my guess is that it is not related to 3.55 signing but to the game it self, maybe it really requieres higher SDK, what do you think?

http://www.ps3hax.net/showthread.php...777#post466777

[jjkkyu]

Originally Posted by elpaso666 ok if it is not related, then your part with fixelf is ok but not the logical structure of script anyway im having trouble here, but my guess is that it is not related to 3.55 signing but to the game it self, maybe it really requieres higher SDK, what do you think? http://www.ps3hax.net/showthread.php...777#post466777

wrong
"24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 41" to "24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 34"
right
"24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 40" to "24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 34"

4.0-4.11 use 40
4.20-4.25 use 41

[elpaso666]

Originally Posted by jjkkyu wrong "24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 41" to "24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 34" right "24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 40" to "24 13 BC C5 F6 00 33 00 00 00 34" 4.0-4.11 use 40 4.20-4.25 use 41

hmmmm, the original eboot is having "41" and param.sfo is 4.11 I know you have said it is not connected but anyway this suprises me... i would expect at least in original BD to be correspoinding

[jjkkyu]

Originally Posted by elpaso666 hmmmm, the original eboot is having "41" and param.sfo is 4.11 I know you have said it is not connected but anyway this suprises me... i would expect at least in original BD to be correspoinding

if you confirm that, this game may need higher sdk to support.