|
|
#221 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 819
Likes: 642
Liked 506 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (3) |
|
|
#222 | |
|
Member
![]() |
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#223 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 601
Liked 622 Times in 373 Posts
Mentioned: 137 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#224 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
too bad cause i love my ps3 !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The key is in the PS3. Otherwise it cannot know whether firmware updates are legit or not. Doesn't matter if they use both key to generate a public-private key combination, the console would still need those two keys to verify the final key validity. You would have to update the console while connected to the internet to get a remote server validation to update a PS3 that doesn't know the key, server which would have the key on it, otherwise IT CANNOT VALIDATE THE KEY. A computer cannot test something against an answer it doesn't have, now that's impossible. The key is in the software, well hidden, but it's in there.
Last edited by chosela; 11-12-2012 at 02:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#226 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 112
Likes: 5
Liked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That is wrong, only the public key is used to test for integrity. The private key is only known to sony. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Apprentice
![]() Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 13
Likes: 4
Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
spp_verifier 4.25 (probably 4.20 - 4.31):
Code:
Erk: D2961BBFFEDAEE269B061454D6ACF262CD71BC6F5320180F0A04A07583CCF7C5 Riv: 6D308B59BC9054B12C833359D31BAE77 Pub: 0CDD0D1541A6B0DFD12E951578536CA60C93853B88FCE17592DC8D134B08A94AF8BB08667E2D70A5 Curve: 07 ************* [ - Post Merged - ] ************* rvklist 4.25 (probably 4.20 - 4.31): Code:
Erk: 695984b7ee2ec2f77fcc3120150dce7e4480d84480ddd8c5940aeb6f79e63d17 Riv: a8ba3e4e63b2bb06fc0ce57e3bb8fc46 Pub: 7f1950c6e497e922400586ee338b41e01c906c5a6dfd75feb5249cfa4bec534f5ca679670a452b2a Curve: 12 Code:
[rvk] type=RVK revision=00 version=00000002 erk=695984b7ee2ec2f77fcc3120150dce7e4480d84480ddd8c5940aeb6f79e63d17 riv=a8ba3e4e63b2bb06fc0ce57e3bb8fc46 pub=7f1950c6e497e922400586ee338b41e01c906c5a6dfd75feb5249cfa4bec534f5ca679670a452b2a priv= ctype=12 Last edited by zxz0O0; 11-12-2012 at 06:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (4) |
|
|
#228 | |
|
Member
![]() |
Revokation List key are confirmed by me with 4.31 prog.srvk using scetool: Code:
C:\Users\MHassan\Desktop\SCETools>scetool -i C:\Users\MHassan\Desktop\SCETools\p rog.srvk scetool 0.2.9 <public build> (C) 2011-2012 by naehrwert NP local license handling (C) 2012 by flatz [*] SCE Header: Magic 0x53434500 [OK] Version 0x00000002 Key Revision 0x0000 Header Type [RVK] Metadata Offset 0x00000000 Header Length 0x0000000000000200 Data Length 0x00000000000000E0[*] Metadata Info: Key 05 51 4A D4 82 CD 77 0C C0 58 C1 53 3C B0 92 1B IV B2 4E ED 49 39 2A 0D CB 03 58 15 9A F1 67 DD BD[*] Metadata Header: Signature Input Length 0x00000000000001C0 unknown_0 0x00000001 Section Count 0x00000002 Key Count 0x0000000E Optional Header Size 0x00000000 unknown_1 0x00000000 unknown_2 0x00000000[*] Metadata Section Headers: Idx Offset Size Type Index Hashed SHA1 Encrypted Key IV Compressed 000 00000200 00000020 01 01 [YES] 00 [NO ] -- -- [NO ] 001 00000220 000000C0 02 02 [YES] 06 [YES] 0C 0D [NO ][*] SCE File Keys: 00: 80 B6 91 44 54 B7 D1 C1 8D 1A ED 39 81 7E E5 2F 01: 84 21 9F 5E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02: D0 BC 27 84 22 30 34 C8 21 DA 58 B6 F0 F7 4A E0 03: C9 FC BC 30 9C A2 15 06 D5 BA 02 F6 FF CC 13 2A 04: 63 BB 9C EF F8 D7 26 45 68 77 94 4C 66 9E A2 1B 05: 87 09 C6 27 3C B7 79 2D 62 6E 14 90 66 F5 BD 86 06: 4B B8 B8 38 51 20 BD 76 9F BA 83 66 04 75 EC 47 07: 6C 84 1D D2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08: D0 BC 27 84 22 30 34 C8 21 DA 58 B6 F0 F7 4A E0 09: C9 FC BC 30 9C A2 15 06 D5 BA 02 F6 FF CC 13 2A 0A: 63 BB 9C EF F8 D7 26 45 68 77 94 4C 66 9E A2 1B 0B: 87 09 C6 27 3C B7 79 2D 62 6E 14 90 66 F5 BD 86 0C: 5B D0 37 88 54 91 80 4C C1 F3 1F 70 AA 9D 0A B5 0D: 17 CA FB 25 69 19 85 85 D1 3A E4 37 00 00 00 00[*] Revoke List Header: type_0 0x00000004 type_1 0x00000001 Version 04.31 Entry Count 0x00000006[*] Program Revoke List Entries: Type Check Version Auth-ID/unk_3 Mask lv2 == 04.31 0000000000000002 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Application == 04.31 vsh FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Application == 04.31 10700005FE000001 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Application == 04.31 sys_init_osd FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Application == 04.31 sys_audio FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Application <= 01.00 1070000400000001 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Code:
[spp] type=SPP revision=0000 version=00000002 erk=D2961BBFFEDAEE269B061454D6ACF262CD71BC6F5320180F0A04A07583CCF7C5 riv=6D308B59BC9054B12C833359D31BAE77 pub=0CDD0D1541A6B0DFD12E951578536CA60C93853B88FCE17592DC8D134B08A94AF8BB08667E2D70A5 priv= ctype=07 Last edited by Abkarino; 11-12-2012 at 06:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (3) |
|
|
#229 |
|
Apprentice
![]() Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 13
Likes: 4
Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
spu_pkg_rvk_verifier 4.25 (untested)
Code:
Erk: f8f99006f1c007d5d0b1909e9566e0e70b569399fc3394a811809fdb5cae92cd Riv: 59d28db4addfb40b7d768bc9667c67b1 Pub: 5432bddd1f97418147aff016eaa6100834f2caa8c498b88965689ee44df349b066cd43cbf4f2c5d0 Curve: 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Member
![]() |
Sorry what do you mean by spu_pkg_rvk_verifier 4.25 this self use the same isoldr keys released before or this is another key for decrypting some thing else?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|