[noobzega]

Originally Posted by JohnnyBoyQC Maiby im wrong but i don't tihnk you have to be in recovery mode to instal 3.55 rogero 3.1 after dehashing.

One guy who work with PS3 tell me to do that, dont know why, but i trust him, also can somebody tell me is it possible to do next?

1. Update E3 flasher 001111
2. Skip backup proces..
3. Afther update E3 go 000001
4. Brick..
5. Is it possible to go back from this brick?

So you dont have any original dump that was on PS3 before you brick it?

[baileyscream]

Originally Posted by haz367 Also this part, all the confusion..i really don't get it.....now i haven't finish the Teensy soldering...so i'm not that Pro ....Mushy fixed it for me, the Teensy dumps the FLASH "unscrambled" by default = IFI header at OFFSET 200 = ready for validate from start, for Progskeet i think there's an option in the TOOL to have it scrambled/unscrambled (IFI or FII at offset 200) by default it's dumped the same as Teensy = unscrambled or byte swapped whatever u name it = IFI header at offset 200 = ready for validate For E3 flasher it's another story, the E3 flasher dumps it UNSCRAMBLED = FII header at offset 200, so to VALIDATE the E3 dumps one must use option 7 in Flowrebuilder "byte reverse dump" so it is "unscrambled" and reads IFI at OFFSET 200, then to flash back via E3 flasher one must use the original "scrambled" bkpps3.bin (FII header at offset 200) then we have the 355 COREOS patches, they have made patches for all of them so one doesn't have to waste time bytereversing/byte swapping/ unscrambling/re-scramble dumps Progskeet_patch.txt: Progskeet/Teensy NOR Progskeet_patch.txt E3 NOR progskeet_patch.txt patches NAND patches

woops

i didnt mean

i also have patching bkpps3.bin (reversed) using flowrebuilder then re-byte reversing then re-flashing the patched dump back (as its done with TEENSY and progskeet)

i ment

i also have patching bkpps3.bin (reversed) using flowrebuilder then re-byte reverse and then write the patched dump back (as its done with TEENSY and progskeet)

as you have to byte reverse the dump to check it you may aswell after checking it patch it THEN re-byte reverse it (so now it is the same as how it came off the sd card + its patched)

then flash the entire dump back.

i agree it is confusing to try and explain. lol

[playerkp420]

Originally Posted by haz367 no it just works fine but hey sometimes talking to the wall makes more sense either "e3_downgrade.bin+bkpps3.bin - switch 1-5 DOWN - 6UP or patched bkpps3.bin with 355COREOS - all switches DOWN = same outcome........ if it bricks along the way it's either "corrupt files" or bad e3 clipping..nothing else...

This is correct. Either way = same outcome.

But if you want to save steps, use Rogero's Nor Dump Patcher. After you have validated your dump and know it is good. Simply drag n drop your bkpps3.bin on the .exe, and BINGO. Ready to flash with all switches down.

To each his own, but I like the least steps needed.

[haz367]

Originally Posted by baileyscream if e3_downgrade.bin has a low success rate

it isn't for real....hehe..but hey each prefer his way...they both are equal on first initial downgrade, nver had a brick/error using the "e3_downgrade.bin"

little weird right if tested product comes like this and it wouldn't work..right
with the patched way it's also not really faster at the end..then again it works perfect but also the e3_downgrade.bin, if it had a "low success rate" then out of 10 should brick/error out on 1 of them..but it doens't so in the end it really doesn't make any differents..

[playerkp420]

Yeah, I never had a problem with the e3_downgrade.bin. The only time it would brick is because the clip came loose. Or one time my power went out.
Which will happen when you flash a patched bios. That doesn't have anything to do with which method.

I never heard of low success rate with one click downgrade. Unless 100% success is a low rate. LOL.

[haz367]

Originally Posted by playerkp420 This is correct. Either way = same outcome. But if you want to save steps

save steps...can u tell me what steps u are skipping then?

this is only talking about E3 ofcourse.....

1) dump
2) validate
3A) drag/drop e3_downgrade.bin on root USB +original bkpps3.bin
4) downgrade with correct switches set (1-5 down - 6UP)

1) dump
2) validate
3B) drag/drop original bkpps3.bin onto Rogero's patcher

the only step ur skipping here is the bytereversing for E3 IF using the ORIGINAL Progskeet patches..nothing else...totally unneeded ofcourse...cuse for that THEY made "E3 Progskeet patches"..so when one is using the Original Progskeet patches instead ..yes one is wasting more time/steps..for nothing
4) downgrade with correct switches set (all down)

faster? i don't see much differents


edit: small typo there in previous QUOTED post from me === damn the byteswapping stuff

For E3 flasher it's another story, the E3 flasher dumps it UNSCRAMBLED

must be

For E3 flasher it's another story, the E3 flasher dumps it SCRAMBLED

[JohnnyBoyQC]

Does anyone have some spare time to Validate my dump in the Dump topic please ?

[noobzega]

Skiped guys :D please answer on my post, want to hear from pro's do I do good. Also can someone tell me is my dump good?

http://www.2shared.com/file/H9HUGWIh..._2004a_9B.html

[JohnnyBoyQC]

Originally Posted by noobzega Skiped guys :D please answer on my post, want to hear from pro's do I do good. Also can someone tell me is my dump good? http://www.2shared.com/file/H9HUGWIh..._2004a_9B.html

there is a topic for this;

http://www.ps3hax.net/showthread.php?t=46100&page=30

[playerkp420]

Originally Posted by haz367 save steps...can u tell me what steps u are skipping then? this is only talking about E3 ofcourse..... 1) dump 2) validate 3A) drag/drop e3_downgrade.bin on root USB +original bkpps3.bin 4) downgrade with correct switches set (1-5 down - 6UP) 1) dump 2) validate 3B) drag/drop original bkpps3.bin onto Rogero's patcher the only step ur skipping here is the bytereversing for E3 IF using the ORIGINAL Progskeet patches..nothing else...totally unneeded ofcourse...cuse for that THEY made "E3 Progskeet patches"..so when one is using the Original Progskeet patches instead ..yes one is wasting more time/steps..for nothing 4) downgrade with correct switches set (all down) faster? i don't see much differents

Right, I meant patching with flowrebuilder is more steps.

one key is the same amount.