Go Back  
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-19-2012   #1
underwurlde
Member
 
underwurlde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: S.England
Posts: 492
Likes: 46
Liked 232 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Make ProgSkeet v1.2 WORK as a v1.1

NOTE: Updated Schematic (with PCB design) here
http://www.ps3hax.net/showpost.php?p...1&postcount=20



Here goes nothing!

To date the ProgSkeet v1.2 does not work (cannot program NAND or NOR chips - although some success has indeed been reported programming NANDs).

In my quest to get my v1.2 to work I noted that the v1.2 shares much the same hardware as the ProgSkeet v1.1 which DOES work. That is to say the ProgSkeet v1.2 and the ProgSkeet v1.1 shares a common FPGA, the Actel ProASIC 3.

Here I describe how I have turned my ProgSkeet v1.2 into a ProgSkeet v1.1:

Image below shows the ProgSkeet v1.2 board wired up such that it then 'becomes' a ProgSkeet v1.1. Unfortunately there is no getting away from the fact that I've had to add extra hardware in the form of a regulator and more importantly a USB driver chip.




To test my theory, I made a daughter board onto which I've wired my ProgSkeet v1.2:



So the million dollar question: Did it work??
After using my InJeCtuS to program in the v1.1 BitStream (ProgSkeet_Retail_Default111006.dat) and using WinSkeet111205 I attempted to dump and Program the NAND you see soldered to my daughter board.

So far, in dumping and programming a NAND chip... YES! Finally my ProgSkeet v1.2 WORKS.

TBD: Testing a NOR chip (thanks @Sarah1331 for sending me a NOR chip to test).

Hope this is of use to someone

Andy
************* [ - Post Merged - ] *************
Out of interest and so that the hardware of the ProgSkeet v1.2 can be compared against the hardware of the ProgSkeet v1.1, see my reverse engineering attempts of this hardware here:

http://www.ps3hax.net/showthread.php?t=46586

Note: In using my ProgSkeet v1.2 as described in the post above, I did NOT change ANY of the resistors on the board - I used it as supplied (R8, R14 and R16 not fitted).

Andy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ProgSkeet v1_2 to v1_1.jpg (236.1 KB, 850 views)
File Type: jpg ProgSkeet v1.2 to v1.1 daughter board.jpg (1.49 MB, 818 views)

Last edited by underwurlde; 12-21-2012 at 05:05 AM.
underwurlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #2
Sarah1331
Senior Member
 
Sarah1331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 358
Liked 402 Times in 318 Posts
Mentioned: 319 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If it does all go ok have you got an estimate to what it will cost a customer to convert there progskeet 1.2 to a 1.1

And I believe you should have the sister board have drill holes where the pads of the skeet 1.2 are so less wires and a more secure connection you could call it a sister qsb lol


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
Sarah1331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #3
underwurlde
Member
 
underwurlde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: S.England
Posts: 492
Likes: 46
Liked 232 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Let me think on this...

As shown, a USB chip is required, the basic cost is 94p, a USB connector is 58p and the regulator £1.14 (not including delivery etc). In fact a connector is not really required - a USB cable could be chopped up and hard-wired to the USB chip.

Don't really need the regulator either if 3.3V supply taken from say a powered PS3.

IF we were to make the daughter-board PCB to support this idea and supply it with components fitted, plus time to make and ship (to the UK, more for abroad of course) then I'd hazard a guesstimate at about £15 all-in for the bits and bobs (<- includes delivery charges) and then £15 for the bare PCB (<- includes delivery charges). No 'profit' in that of course

Sound reasonable?

'Customer' then gets the basic connection hardware onto which they place their ProgSkeet v1.2. Or just wait for a working BitStream for the v1.2 to appear.

Note: Connecting up to a single NAND chip is FAR easier than connecting up a NOR chip. If connecting to a NAND, don't need all that green wiring (directly to the FPGA chip) shown in the picture of my daughter board above.

Andy

Last edited by underwurlde; 01-31-2013 at 02:26 PM.
underwurlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #4
M8nTrap
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France
Posts: 58
Likes: 7
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
woaw! the newest ferrari!!! Andy you are hugely awesome! and so reactive...i'm on the butt
now i want to know if i am capable to perform that modification...
before all, i go read your conversion document! and wait some's news about your NOR dump test.

I thank you for that job!
__________________
buddy, I'm sorry! I'm not speaking English... that's real!!
M8nTrap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #5
Sarah1331
Senior Member
 
Sarah1331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 358
Liked 402 Times in 318 Posts
Mentioned: 319 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by M8nTrap View Post
woaw! the newest ferrari!!! Andy you are hugely awesome! and so reactive...i'm on the butt
now i want to know if i am capable to perform that modification...
before all, i go read your conversion document! and wait some's news about your NOR dump test.

I thank you for that job!
If you can solder 0.25 pitch freehand you piss this


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
Sarah1331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #6
Decoy
Member
 
Decoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sea
Posts: 165
Likes: 14
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Great job Andy , but I have a question :

What if we don't want to remove the chip , I mean we just directly solder the wires from the prog to the mobo, does it work the same way ? Because on the daughter board I see that we must remove the chip and put it on it , what I am saying is : is there any other design that makes progskeet 1.2 be 1.1 without removal of chip ? , just a normal 1.1 , with pinouts and support of the ziff socket ... Thanks
Decoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #7
Sarah1331
Senior Member
 
Sarah1331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 358
Liked 402 Times in 318 Posts
Mentioned: 319 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by Decoy View Post
Great job Andy , but I have a question :

What if we don't want to remove the chip , I mean we just directly solder the wires from the prog to the mobo, does it work the same way ? Because on the daughter board I see that we must remove the chip and put it on it , what I am saying is : is there any other design that makes progskeet 1.2 be 1.1 without removal of chip ? , just a normal 1.1 , with pinouts and support of the ziff socket ... Thanks
You don't remove Any chip


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
Sarah1331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #8
underwurlde
Member
 
underwurlde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: S.England
Posts: 492
Likes: 46
Liked 232 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The daughter board IS as the ProgSkeet v1.1 - Look at the 4 sets of solder pads around the ProgSkeet v1.2 board - they are laid out exactly as per the ProgSkeet v1.1.

But while I was at it, I ALSO provided for soldering to a NAND flash chip (because I couldn't be ar$ed to do all that wiring to an in-situ NAND flash chip - so I removed one from a PS3 and soldered it onto my daughter board). So, if you understand me, NO you don't have to remove a NAND chip and solder it onto my daughter board and YES you can use the solder pads to wire to a NAND (or NOR) chip which is soldered into say a PS3 - i.e. just like a 'normal' ProgSkeet v1.1.

I mean we just directly solder the wires from the prog to the mobo, does it work the same way ?
So, to answer your question: YES

and support of the ziff socket ...
No 50 way ZIF connector on there though for 'solderless' connection at the mo'. Should I put one on perhaps?

Andy
underwurlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #9
Decoy
Member
 
Decoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sea
Posts: 165
Likes: 14
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by underwurlde View Post

No 50 way ZIF connector on there though for 'solderless' connection at the mo'. Should I put one on perhaps?

Andy
I'm counting on the ziff socket actually , because I'm using this to wire the ps3:



It a header board that came with the nor clip , I use it instead of the pcb P's
Decoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012   #10
underwurlde
Member
 
underwurlde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: S.England
Posts: 492
Likes: 46
Liked 232 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Okies! Will add it. Guess it won't be complete without it TBH.

Andy
underwurlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



PS3Hax.net is Copyright © 2010-2013.
Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. All Trademarks and images are owned by their respected owners.
Posts and links are subject to each author on this forum and are no way affiliated with the operations and/or opinions of ps3hax.net
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 AM.