[GregoryRasputin]

Originally Posted by marty370 Quality hardware(less failure rates) = PS ORBIS > 720

You cant say that, you do not know how the 720 will be built, this is just your fanboy prejudice speaking.

Originally Posted by fanboysarestupid Proof reading should be something PS3HAX posters should do than just posting it on a rush.

When ever you become a PS3HaX news Poster, you are more than welcome to do that, until then, be happy with what you have got.

[marty370]

Originally Posted by fanboysarestupid Proof reading should be something PS3HAX posters should do than just posting it on a rush. @marty370 , neither consoles are out so you can't know what's the hardware failure of either. You're just trolling as much as him. @VideoX , yet those who are so anti-digital download pirated games, not saying anyone in specific, but you know it's true.

That wasn't TROLLING on my part, I was comparing on past hardware products reliabilty, I've had MS products before and they SUCK(keyboards/mice), reliablity suck. I'd take SONY products any day over MS.

[GregoryRasputin]

Originally Posted by marty370 That wasn't TROLLING on my part, I was comparing on past hardware products reliabilty, I've had MS prodructs before and they SUCK(keyboards/mice), reliablity suck. I'd take SONY products any day over MS.

Ive had a PS2 and an Xbox 1, the Xbox 1 lived, long, long after the PS2 had died.


You take SONY because you are a SONY fanboy and fanboys SUCK

[fanboysarestupid]

Originally Posted by GregoryRasputin You cant say that, you do not know how the 720 will be built, this is just your fanboy prejudice speaking. When ever you become a PS3HaX news Poster, you are more than welcome to do that, until then, be happy with what you have got.

1) I'm not a fanboy, I'm just being fair and saying that no one knows what the failure rate is of either, so that's to be left to when it's known.

2) As much as I hate IGN, they're the ones who deliver the game news and whatnot, and you guys for the other stuff. I'm too lazy to write news, unless it's a rant.

[GregoryRasputin]

Originally Posted by fanboysarestupid 1) I'm not a fanboy, I'm just being fair and saying that no one knows what the failure rate is of either, so that's to be left to when it's known. 2) As much as I hate IGN, they're the ones who deliver the game news and whatnot, and you guys for the other stuff. I'm too lazy to write news, unless it's a rant.

1.) I wasn't calling YOU a fanboy.
2.) If your reading skills are the same as your writing skills, then we would all be f*ckded, refer to #1.....

[japsander]

Originally Posted by stomp_442 cloud gaming would be bad. there is a certain percentage of the population that cannot even receive high speed internet. that would automatically exclude those people, and only go to profit the competition that don't require cloud gaming. then there are those that just don't buy into that crap. if there is a cloud gaming service on a console then it should not be the only way to play your games. that would be a big mistake. r.i.p. pspgo. troll

pspgo isnt cloud gaming.
cloud gaming is where "no" content is stored and is streamed to you in real time making it a requirement to be online at all times.

pspgo is simply a digital content platform

i agree though with what you say. cloud gaming should never be relied upon. that would basically exclude all rural areas nationwide.

720p would take a very stable/low latency connection which is not common on adsl lines. onlive say 5 Mbps or faster is recommended with a 3.5 Mbps minimum. much of the uk is on less than 5 and would simply pass on the new playstation and stick with xbox or nintendo
when i had a good year (4Mbps connection) i tried gakai and the quality was shockingly bad with latency that was beyond a joke
1080p would be an absolute no go for anyone not on superfast connections

i seriously doubt that sony would be so stupid as to rely on the cloud or at least i hope so. one blown fuse could leave millions of people in an uproar lol and also if they were to go that route, they would be wasting the ps4 hardware as it would be unneeded due to the remote server doing the processing and simply sending you the video stream

if they do go that route, i really hope all those who push/support the push for cloud gaming get an issue with their connections like their wifes trying to watch hollyoaks on 4OD making the whole internet crawl :D

[ICECOLDKILLAH]

Quality hardware(less failure rates) = PS ORBIS > 720

the cooling was just bad on the first 360s, the 360 hardware itself is better,
then the one on ps3, or why are about 90% of all multiplatform games more stable and look better on the 360???
yeah sure its because the game developers are lazy, lol, i think after 6 years we can finally say it cannot be the developers fault, i mean 6 years, cmon ^^

and now dont say im a xbox fanboy or something, i have both consoles since the beginning and i also liked my ps2 more then my old xbox 1

sry for the consolewar offtopic ^^

i dont really think that the ps4 or the next xbox will be much better then this generation, some better graphics, maybe (i hope so) real anti aliasing on every game and maybe all games run in 1080p with 60fps

[fanboysarestupid]

Originally Posted by GregoryRasputin 1.) I wasn't calling YOU a fanboy. 2.) If your reading skills are the same as your writing skills, then we would all be f*ckded, refer to #1.....

Whatever about number one, the second one, you didn't understand what I meant by that, your problem, not mine.

[GregoryRasputin]

Originally Posted by fanboysarestupid Whatever about number one, the second one, you didn't understand what I meant by that, your problem, not mine.

You are a bit of a retard aren't you.

[hellsing9]

Originally Posted by GregoryRasputin You are a bit of a retard aren't you.

Nope he is stupid as his username says so.

======================================

Ontopic:

Main problem here is not the debate that author makes mention about RAM on xbox720 or PS4 hence is pure speculation and we don't have official specs from both consoles.

Also there's a slight misconception about RAM because in the article as you can see nobody is sure about microprocessor capabilities nor other vital components of both new *next gen* consoles. (Yeah we talked about AMD, on PS4, etc) but again is speculation.

If Sony has Gaikai well on that area is nothing *new* probably some severe headaches to the one who don't have a stable internet connection or worst they don't have internet connection at all.

It's easy to target and bash or measure which one who will possible be more *powerful* but it's crystal clear that for months or even years both of them were aiming to not *tangible* content and cloud systems to force end user to embrace that idea and finally accept it.
If you can use plus today to upload your saves (as Ubisoft and their ****ty system of cloud saves on AS series and even play it) why you can't store all your games and even play them from a *secure* remote location?.

I think (personally) that this while mess up whole gaming experience.
If this only serves only for media streaming, im cool with that but having my games stored in some remote server and paying some good money for them and not having a retail...don't like that. It's far from secure specially when we are talking about Sony's *security* on that area.

Yes, you have steam and many other platforms that uses that *method* that's secure but is 10 times more reliable on PC than a console. (I won't bother to mention Origin...*ways*)

Also internet connection is imperative for next-gen (Even for this gen with most of the devices we use) and this new type of online content will see some *new kind* of piracy.
After all if all this goes wrong they will *excuse* themselves with the old and uses motto = *We use/used Gaikai to battle piracy*.