|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 1,314
Liked 941 Times in 532 Posts
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Project64 v2.0.0.5
Apparently the group working on this has finally started offering updated versions again. It's been so long since an update that I stopped checking their site. I've been using v1.7.50 for a while now. The down side is that you have to donate $20 to get a version newer than 1.7. I would love to find a link to a free 2.0+ version So I'll keep looking.
Source http://www.pj64-emu.com/component/op...faq/Itemid,58/ Last edited by BobbyBangin; 01-24-2013 at 01:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,948
Likes: 6,265
Liked 3,838 Times in 2,494 Posts
Mentioned: 952 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
No doubt we will find a copy, I bet they have been spurred on by the recent banjo tooie algo crack
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 1,314
Liked 941 Times in 532 Posts
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I hope so. I won't be paying $20. WTF is that all about anyways? I thought donations were supposed to be optional? Personally, I think it's the best emulator. I hope it has more to offer than just Banjo Tooie. Hopefully they haven't just come out to make a little more money off of it. It would also be really cool if they would release the source so somebody could work on an emulator for PS3.
Last edited by BobbyBangin; 01-24-2013 at 02:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#4 | |||
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,948
Likes: 6,265
Liked 3,838 Times in 2,494 Posts
Mentioned: 952 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Banjo tooie had 267 128bit strings, each of which return a 128bit key. Now if BT, JFG and a few other RARE/NINTENDO games run already but use a hacky approach they have had to use workaround after workaround to get it to work, they can replace their hacky code into tighter clean code and optimize it further. We should see significant speed up alone imho. EDIT: found more info on v2.0.0.6/7 closed alpha from 2013-01-07 , but no download:
![]() EDIT 2: Slightly off topic (?) I found an updated version of PJ64K from 2 days ago, but it's most likely still based on PJ64 1.7 Changes:
HERE
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 1,314
Liked 941 Times in 532 Posts
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likes: (1) |
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Next door...
Posts: 704
Likes: 592
Liked 439 Times in 239 Posts
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Sounds almost like true blue
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,948
Likes: 6,265
Liked 3,838 Times in 2,494 Posts
Mentioned: 952 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I cant afford $20 for "alpha privileges" ...
For $20 I would want the full emu 100% working, not a promise of something that may never happen, and a sketchy alpha build... 1.7 users have had 1.7 since the end of 2005..... 8 years later we have to pay for a new build... I bet an equivalent mod of mupen or 1964 or something will come out for free before project64 becomes reasonable.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,481
Likes: 8,215
Liked 14,598 Times in 5,595 Posts
Mentioned: 1325 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
This project sucks dick >.<
Closed source and charging people $20 to play a f*cking emulator :/ |
|
|
|
|
Likes: (3) |
|
|
#9 |
|
Annelies Marie Frank
![]()
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 4,570
Likes: 1,584
Liked 2,431 Times in 1,326 Posts
Mentioned: 446 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
They should at least release a LITE version for free and offer upgrades for $20.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 908
Likes: 303
Liked 450 Times in 297 Posts
Mentioned: 79 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'd say what they are doing isn't all that bad.
They are not like True Blue or Cobra. What they do is that they _always_ host the stable version for free, and only allow donators to download the beta versions. I say it is cool, as long as its just beta versions they don't release publicly. After all, it gives an advantage to donators, while everyone can enjoy the cake when its done being baked. I see no problems there. Its just like www.securitytube.net (awesome place if you like IT security). The owner there has a _****load_ of videos, courses, recorded lectures, all that ****. Everything becomes free, when it has been there for one year. And its fantastic stuff that there is there. It only gives some advantage to the donators that helps keep the site running, by allowing them access to the videos first. The owner has no intention of keeping stuff away from you. Another comparison could be to 4chan. Moot (the owner) introduced "4chan passes", which allows donators(/people that buy the passes) to post there without having to type in that retarded captcha... Everyone can still post there. Now, I will address one problem/flaw with Project 64's model.... When something is a beta for the past ... 7 years? It becomes quite retarded that it is still being kept unaccessible. I mean... securitytube would suck as well, if he decided to keep videos away from people for an indefinite, but surely long time, and then suddenly just release them. But then again, I actually have tried 1.7... It is truly a beta, it ran A LOT less stable than 1.6... and while I had less graphical errors, it crashed everytime for me on both my computers, when running on fullscreen mode and something popped up in the background (Yes, I could disable skype to avoid those popups... but have fun disabling all popups... from things such as your antivirus and from windows as well... only to enable the important ones later on). There was no way they could release the 1.7 I experienced publicly (and yes, I tried the latest 1.7 build too). In that sense, it is just some "bonus" that donators could try and download the unstable 1.7 and see how it ran on their system. I guess, the true sad 'problem' with Project 64 is that development seems to have stopped on it, and we cannot blame them for that.... I was really happy to hear with this post, that they seem to have started working on it again though! I haven't tried 1964 and Mugen lately, so I don't know if they have reached the level of project 64... But the last time I tried them, they seemed below Project 64. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|