[KentaZX]

Originally Posted by CaptainCPS-X Hiyas once again , here you have the complete PKG that includes my patch for 3.40+ / 4.XX and the documentation included . Thanks to the kind person who made the pack for me, I recommend everyone to use this one since is more complete. RetroArch 0.9.8 CFW 3.41-4.xx.zip [~30 MB] EDIT: Here you have another pack with the official release + extra signed files, thanks to the other kind person for handing me these: http://www.mediafire.com/?x4gg5u41y3c8n8p [~100 MB] SeeYa!

The link for the 100 MB pack is dead... that was fast honestly..anyways think you can reupload this please? Also, thanks for taking the time to resign this package.

[LoboGuara]

Some FBA games are starting in service mode/diagnostic menu, and I cannot find an option to change the dip switches :/

Edit: CPS 1/2 games are working fine, only the old "jamma" and Taito arcade games are affected (i.e 1942, black tiger, darius).

Edit2: @CaptainCPS-X : There is a problem with the pkg. The snes9x_next core is the prboom self renamed.

Edit3: The OP package has the same problem. There is no snes9x_next, just a renamed prboom. I isolated the cores to confirm: snes9x_next.SELF launch the prboom core. The CORE.SELF also seems to be the same file.

[Adamsville]

RetroArch 0.9.8 CFW 3.41-4.xx.zip w/ SNES Core Fix

http://www.mediafire.com/?acc7x7zcm2ccboo

salute to @STLcardsWS for the heads up

[CaptainCPS-X]

Originally Posted by Adamsville RetroArch 0.9.8 CFW 3.41-4.xx.zip w/ SNES Core Fix http://www.mediafire.com/?acc7x7zcm2ccboo salute to @STLcardsWS for the heads up

Thanks @Adamsville ! was going to post that just now, I was busy with some stuff and couldn't post it

SeeYa!

[LoboGuara]

Apparently it's the same snes9x core from the beta3 unofficial release. I do not understand why he renamed the snes9x_next.SELF to core.self instead of replacing the existing one.

I will take the liberty of replacing the snes9x core and repack Retroarch 0.9.8 later =]

[Adamsville]

Originally Posted by LoboGuara Apparently it's the same snes9x core from the beta3 unofficial release. I do not understand why he renamed the snes9x_next.SELF to core.self instead of replacing the existing one. I will take the liberty of replacing the snes9x core and repack Retroarch 0.9.8 later =]

Nope, its a fresh compile.... Its named Core.self purposely, after first boot RetroArch will rename it on its own.

[LoboGuara]

Originally Posted by Adamsville Nope, its a fresh compile.... Its named Core.self purposely, after first boot RetroArch will rename it on its own.

Fresh or not, It´s the same 1.52.3 release from b3 =]

I Replaced the snes9x_next.SELF with the same b3 release and repacked. No problems so far. The pkg STL provided also works fine. Different ways of thinking, same results

[pete_uk]

Originally Posted by LoboGuara Apparently it's the same snes9x core from the beta3 unofficial release. I do not understand why he renamed the snes9x_next.SELF to core.self instead of replacing the existing one.

No it's not. Both the snes9x core and beta 3 were compiled by me.
I compiled the Snes core last night using the latest commits from the Snes9x-Next and Retroarch git hub repos.

Oh and you got it the wrong way round. Core.self has to be renamed.

Originally Posted by LoboGuara Fresh or not, It´s the same 1.52.3 release from b3 =] I Replaced the snes9x_next.SELF with the same b3 release and repacked. No problems so far. The pkg STL provided also works fine. Different ways of thinking, same results

The last beta I released contained the newest version of the PS3 version of the snes9x core, that's why it's the same.


@Adamsville - 100% correct mate

[LoboGuara]

Originally Posted by pete_uk No it's not. Both the snes9x core and beta 3 were compiled by me. I compiled the Snes core last night using the latest commits from the Snes9x-Next and Retroarch git hub repos. Oh and you got it the wrong way round. Core.self has to be renamed. The last beta I released contained the newest version of the PS3 version of the snes9x core, that's why it's the same.

Since it is the same version 1.52.3, I did not understand the practical difference.

Worked fine here. What exactly is the difference between renaming the core and replace the snes9x core itself? The old core.self is the prboom core.

Sorry for the questions (and for the usual broken english), but I like to understand the logic behind these emulators.

[pete_uk]

Originally Posted by LoboGuara Since it is the same version 1.52.3, I did not understand the practical difference. Worked fine here. What exactly is the difference between renaming the core and replace the snes9x core itself? The old core.self is the prboom core. Sorry for the questions (and for the usual broken english), but I like to understand the logic behind these emulators.

When you first run Retroarch, It will search it's USRDIR for a core.self and then it renames it, e.g core.self becomes snes9x_next.self.

When compiling retroarch, it names the core as core.self. I then have to manually rename each core to the proper name before compiling the next. The last one compiled is left as CORE.SELF

As all that was needed was the Snes core, That's all I compiled