[hellsing9]

KDSbest this man has some future project and he now talked about RPCS3 emulator. For some reason the other party ignored on how to improve or make something better with this emulator for unknown reasons.
Still KDSbest never gives up and has the upper hand (sometimes i think this guy is a robot) Kudos!

[Read More]

[tjhooker73]

Link broken.. Why..

[Rautz]

@tjhooker73

http://www.ps3hax.net/2013/02/rpcs3-...vices-ignored/

[defyboy]

Improving compatibility and operational functionality trumps performance at such an early stage in the development cycle IMO.

But then again, *****ing and whining usually gets things done. Keep up the good work.

[hellsing9]

Originally Posted by tjhooker73 Link broken.. Why..

Because we have some problems with *read more*.
Not the first nor the last time that this happens.

If you don't give enough time for me to edit...well.
Everytime i edit the article *read more* link get's all messed up.

[KDSBest]

Originally Posted by defyboy Improving compatibility and operational functionality trumps performance at such an early stage in the development cycle IMO. But then again, *****ing and whining usually gets things done. Keep up the good work.

I never talked about improving compatibility and doing it right will pay off in the end for sure. Doing it this way it needs to get refactored at the end when the code got big.

And thanks for the kudos you guys just support me too well

[cboushell]

Where does anyone get the idea that his suggestions are being ignored by the devs of this project? His suggestions were just given a couple of days ago. Did the devs of this project reply in some way that I don't know of?

[hellsing9]

Originally Posted by cboushell Where does anyone get the idea that his suggestions are being ignored by the devs of this project? His suggestions were just given a couple of days ago. Did the devs of this project reply in some way that I don't know of?

[smf]

Originally Posted by cboushell Where does anyone get the idea that his suggestions are being ignored by the devs of this project? His suggestions were just given a couple of days ago. Did the devs of this project reply in some way that I don't know of?

If you work on a project like this you are often bombarded with advice from people you don't know on how to do things better. While in a few rare cases they might have a point, it's just not worth taking the time to find that out. Even when an idea sounds plausible, there might be a reason why implementing it is too hard or doesn't actually work out so well in practise because of reasons you haven't considered.

You should implement the idea yourself and submit the patch if you want someone to take notice.

One of the points about binary search instead of switch/case statements. Sometimes the compiler will actually implement it that way, it depends on which compiler and whether it thinks it will be faster that way. It also depends on the processor, because a big set of if checks might actually work out faster if branch prediction allows the common cases to execute quicker.

[KDSBest]

Originally Posted by smf If you work on a project like this you are often bombarded with advice from people you don't know on how to do things better. While in a few rare cases they might have a point, it's just not worth taking the time to find that out. Even when an idea sounds plausible, there might be a reason why implementing it is too hard or doesn't actually work out so well in practise because of reasons you haven't considered. You should implement the idea yourself and submit the patch if you want someone to take notice. One of the points about binary search instead of switch/case statements. Sometimes the compiler will actually implement it that way, it depends on which compiler and whether it thinks it will be faster that way. It also depends on the processor, because a big set of if checks might actually work out faster if branch prediction allows the common cases to execute quicker.

Dolphin builds a big lookup table which is even easier to implement than both and the fastest way. I work on it but this takes time to implement nothing done in some days. The lookup table is fast implemented but the recompilation is tricky.