[badhabit]

Originally Posted by zecoxao DON'T BE A ****ING NOOB AND TRY THAT TCL!!!!!!!! IT WILL BRICK!!!!!! I'M WARNING YOU!!!!!!

thats why i wrote there is a "high brick risk" ..
and dont worry i have a progskeet ..
does it only brick if you use the tcl like the fself appldr patch tcl ..
or also if you do the patching without tcl and mfw builder ?

[zecoxao]

you have to know how to peek-poke to get the rest of the dump

[euss]

Originally Posted by zecoxao DON'T BE A ****ING NOOB AND TRY THAT TCL!!!!!!!! IT WILL BRICK!!!!!! I'M WARNING YOU!!!!!! @euss , remove that ****ing thing from the wiki, or else i will :/

There is no patch for stupidity feel free to change, remove or improve the warning message on that page.

But I have a strong feeling that if people are willing to test out things they
* don't understand
* is surrounded by words as "brick"
* are in bold, +1 text size
* inside a red box that says "warning, do not use!"
then I have a feeling that all effort would be meaningless to prevent.

Lets face it: writing books about nuclear fusion can be interesting, but if you don't understand it then you need to keep out or face the concequences of radiation poisoning (insert quote about boyscout that collected smoke detectors for radioactive elements)

[zadow28]

got this info on the lv0

Zodiac Code Decipher v0.2
-------------------------

Parsing Cipher: lv0
Cipher Length:  120 characters
Cipher Uniques: 13 unique characters

[H3avyRa1n]

it's great to see you breaking ground.

[xi123xi]

yea lets hope something good.

[Amic3r]

My idea is to solder to RAM chips, use some uController or computer to analyze input (not make a dump of everything in memory, but rather write what is happening to file so we can analyze something that is removed quickly), then look for lv0/keys, basically analyze bootprocess vs. RAM content.

[pepethedon]

THIS is what I'm talking about! Let's get some ideas brewing!!

[Amic3r]

Originally Posted by pepethedon THIS is what I'm talking about! Let's get some ideas brewing!!

The main point of it, that CELL BE has to decrypt it SOMEWHERE, so obviously it will put unecrypted data to RAM. If it wants it to be 'secure' it will obviously remove it within miliseconds if not less, so you would need PC hooked up to PS3's ram analyzing it's working, but now, how RAM works :v.

[pepethedon]

Originally Posted by Amic3r The main point of it, that CELL BE has to decrypt it SOMEWHERE, so obviously it will put unecrypted data to RAM. If it wants it to be 'secure' it will obviously remove it within miliseconds if not less, so you would need PC hooked up to PS3's ram analyzing it's working, but now, how RAM works :v.

I remember someone partially dumping the RAM on the PS3 but to no avail :\ Are you testing on OFW?