[budzio]

if it is jb king thread so what was reason you mentioned atmel's flip soft? jb king is on Actel.

[zadow28]

how do we know its on actel and not amtel the wiki dosent have any info on jb-king?
maybe im reading the wiki wrong.

[budzio]

would like to know how you have indentified the dongle ?

@zadow28 stop drinking/smoking or I should because I can't totally understand way you are thinking
Everything is on ps3devwiki
or check photo

and http://www.ps3devwiki.com/wiki/ReDRM_/_Piracy_dongles
What else you want to identify?

[zadow28]

i have maybe smoke to much.
just wierd when the dfu files should be for amtel.

[budzio]

JB-King is "1:1 copy" of TB so it is on Actel and well protected as TB. JB2USB is on different chip (there was suspicion it is on Atmel but probably wrong). Different chip means that jb2usb developers reversed TB firmware (converted into source code and recompiled to own use). In GraVoX theory this dongle is less protected.
Due to this it is better to concentrate on jb2usb and that is what GraVoX and Mark Webber are doing...

[zadow28]

according to the picture the mcu is this one



http://www.st.com/internet/mcu/product/164476.jsp

here is some more of the dfu chain

[furtsiv]

hi
why we can not create our own TB dongles and copy the same data in the original to our dongles??

[japsander]

Originally Posted by furtsiv hi why we can not create our own TB dongles and copy the same data in the original to our dongles??

you can as long as you use the exact hardware and code which is what jbking did with the most important parts of their dongle making it require significently less work to get it working

[furtsiv]

so is it hard to find the same hardware used by TB ??

[hellsing9]

As far as i know even skeet uses Actel chip...it's a generic chip?.